Wouldn’t you be interested in using a tool that lets you earn money while also driving social change\u2014and having fun doing it?
With GVS, that wish can come true.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
GVS is a tool designed to spark what’s called a \u201cCivic Drive.\u201d If a Civic Drive can be achieved, then every person on Earth can become wealthy<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This article offers a concise explanation of how such a society\u2014where everyone can get rich\u2014can actually be built, along with the key benefits of doing so. You might think that a society where everyone becomes wealthy is just a fantasy. The kind of work that meets all of these criteria is exactly what I\u2019m proposing with GVS. And by distributing donations from wealthy individuals to the citizens participating in GVS, The following three articles provide more detailed explanations of Civic Drive and GVS. If you\u2019d just like to get an overall picture, this article gives you the big picture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The kind of work that\u2019s simple enough for children to do is participating in the app I\u2019m proposing: GVS (Group Voting System)<\/strong>. Even if someone can\u2019t read or write, they can simply use voice input. Since this is work meant to make everyone<\/strong> wealthy\u2014not just a select few\u2014it has to be simple enough for anyone to participate<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Even if a task is simple, people won\u2019t do it if it\u2019s boring. With GVS, your opinions are reflected in society in real time<\/strong>, so you can experience the same sense of agency and omnipotence<\/strong> you feel when playing a game. What\u2019s more, with AI support based on psychological techniques, a strong sense of unity<\/strong> naturally forms among participants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As a result, the work becomes something people get deeply involved in and truly excited about\u2014like a festival<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It\u2019s said that over 90% of the money currently in circulation is tied up in asset management<\/strong>. In other words, unless we can tap into the funds that the wealthy are using for asset management, That\u2019s why, if we truly want to make everyone on Earth wealthy, it becomes crucial to consider: A Civic Drive refers to citizen-led governance<\/strong>. What distinguishes a Civic Drive society from conventional democratic systems is that labor for the sake of employment disappears<\/strong>, We will be able to live in highly technologically advanced cities<\/strong>, The kind of work done through GVS can be described simply as technological development<\/strong>. Moreover, instead of being built around economies or nation-states, society becomes centered on its citizens\u2014 In today\u2019s capitalist society, even humans themselves are commodified. For example, the current society, which focuses technological development on killing people to win wars<\/strong>, The capitalist and nationalist systems are ultimately irrational<\/strong> when viewed from the standpoint of human well-being. So when a Civic Drive is launched, our society can become the dream society that many have envisioned<\/strong>. In order to launch a Civic Drive, GVS is essential<\/strong>. GVS, on the other hand, has the power to spark such movements. Reading up to this point, you might be wondering just how powerful this tool really is. At its core, the GVS system is simple: participants discuss and select one representative<\/strong>. Why is it designed this way? GVS is built on a psychological framework that naturally enables people to reach a conclusion through dialogue\u2014 The basic procedure of GVS starts with choosing a discussion room based on a topic you\u2019re interested in<\/strong>. Once you enter, participants are randomly divided into small groups of 3 to 5 people<\/strong>. Eventually, a single final representative is chosen<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n You might be thinking: \u201cCan this really lead to actual tax cuts?\u201d<\/em> A more detailed explanation of how GVS works is available in other articles, For example, even if someone posts on an anonymous message board saying, \u201cThis politician is amazing,\u201d and everyone agrees\u2014nothing is truly decided<\/strong> by that alone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why? Because there\u2019s no sense of responsibility<\/strong>. That\u2019s because people think: \u201cWell, they\u2019re the one with the great ideas, so they should take responsibility and act.\u201d That\u2019s why, if people want to spark real change\u2014a Civic Drive\u2014they often feel they must unite through protests or even riots. That\u2019s because a true Civic Drive is rooted in the intention to build a cooperative civilization<\/strong>\u2014 So what about the voting systems used around the world? However, voting is actually worse than anonymous message boards or the influence of popular social media figures<\/strong>. In essence, voting becomes little more than a popularity contest driven by individual psychological reflexes<\/strong>. As a result, even the most capable politicians cannot change society<\/strong> through such a system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In short, whenever people unite and act together, deep, logical deliberation is absolutely essential<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In GVS, participants discuss via chat in groups of 3 to 5 people<\/strong>. Since communication happens through chat, those who are more articulate don’t dominate the conversation<\/strong>. At the end of the discussion, the group selects a representative. This sense of personal involvement and social agreement<\/strong> creates a kind of psychological pressure that leads to cohesion and unity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n When participants see someone taking action based on the outcome of a GVS discussion, In short, GVS is designed to help participants realize: These mechanisms are largely inspired by Adlerian psychology<\/strong>, No, arguments don\u2019t break out\u2014because the system automatically rewrites language<\/strong> to prevent conflict. [Before Conversion]<\/strong> It gets automatically transformed into something like this:<\/p>\n\n\n\n [After Conversion]<\/strong> As you can see, the AI automatically rephrases emotionally charged language into constructive expressions<\/strong>. So even people who would normally hesitate to participate in discussions out of fear of arguments The example above doesn\u2019t actually offer a concrete proposal, so the conversation wouldn\u2019t progress far on its own\u2014 There is a separate article that goes into detail with simulations of how this conversion works in GVS. For now, we\u2019ll continue with the overall explanation without going too deep here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The reasoning behind how discussions are transformed to avoid conflict lies in Adlerian psychology<\/strong>, particularly the concept of the \u201cAdlerian Triangle.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Conversations framed as \u201cPoor me\u201d<\/em> or \u201cThat person is bad\u201d<\/em> tend to divide participants and lead to arguments<\/strong>. As a result, even during disagreements, people don\u2019t attack each other by insisting they\u2019re right<\/strong> or by condemning others as wrong.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The confrontational style of speech described above is rooted in a competitive, survival-based era\u2014a civilization built around the concept of killing<\/strong>. It\u2019s also important to understand that we\u2019ve learned this aggressive communication style because we lived in nationalist societies<\/strong>\u2014so there\u2019s no shame or need to feel guilty about it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, if we learn from GVS\u2019s AI-based rephrasing and adopt cooperative language patterns<\/strong>, In a post-GVS world, humanity will naturally be composed of people who\u2019ve learned this cooperative way of speaking<\/strong> from the start. The system is designed so that it’s impossible to convey intentions like \u201cI hate you\u201d or \u201cI want to attack you.\u201d<\/strong> In essence, when someone feels like saying \u201cI hate you\u201d or \u201cI want to attack you,\u201d In today\u2019s world, people often attempt to assert those demands through conflict or even war<\/strong>, However, if we adopt Adlerian-style communication<\/strong>, we can fulfill our needs through cooperation rather than competition<\/strong>. That\u2019s why killing is prohibited by law: This holds true not just in democratic societies but in all types of nations<\/strong>: Therefore, at least in the case of using GVS among people in the same country<\/strong>, In order for people to feel like they are friends or part of the same group<\/strong>, it\u2019s intuitive that discrimination must be eliminated<\/strong>. That\u2019s why, in GVS, all communication is text-based\u2014voice is not used<\/strong>, and participants remain anonymous<\/strong>. For example, if a 5-year-old shares an opinion, it will be automatically converted into adult-level phrasing<\/strong>. You might wonder, \u201cWouldn\u2019t that make the meaning unclear?\u201d<\/em> Human language is inherently designed so that anyone who can use language can also understand it<\/strong>. What matters is that we see each other as teammates<\/strong>, as friends. The moment we see someone as \u201cnot one of us,\u201d<\/strong> our shared decisions become impersonal<\/strong>, That\u2019s why, if the user identifies as female, everyone\u2019s messages can appear in feminine language<\/strong>. If you prefer not to use gendered language, you can select a random setting<\/strong>, Either way, unless a participant voluntarily reveals their identity<\/strong>, As for nationality, everything is translated.
If you’re curious for more details, in-depth explanations are available in related articles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
Can We Really Create a Society Where Everyone Becomes Wealthy?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
But it’s actually possible\u2014as long as we can create work that satisfies the following three conditions:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
Because GVS has the power to spark a Civic Drive, it becomes a type of work that anyone would gladly support through donations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
we\u2014the people of Earth\u2014can receive the greatest rewards imaginable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
If you’re interested in learning more about specific topics, these articles are highly recommended.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
What Kind of Work Is Simple Enough That Even Children Can Do It?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
All you have to do in GVS is chat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
So it\u2019s fair to say that this is a type of work anyone can do<\/strong>, regardless of ability.<\/p>\n\n\n\nWhat Kind of Work Is So Fun That Anyone Would Want to Do It?<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
That\u2019s why the work needs to be as engaging as a game<\/strong>\u2014something that gives people a sense of capability and empowerment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It\u2019s similar to that feeling when a single button press in a game lets you build an entire town.<\/p>\n\n\n\nWhat Kind of Work Would Make the Wealthy Want to Invest\u2014Even by Liquidating Their Assets?<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
As a result, very little money flows outside of the financial markets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
it will be difficult for all of humanity to achieve high incomes<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Would the wealthy feel compelled to donate to a Civic Drive launched through GVS?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\nWhat Is a Civic Drive?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
It\u2019s a system where citizens themselves take direct control of politics and the economy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
and technological development becomes fully optimized.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
and the speed of innovation is expected to accelerate by more than 100 times<\/strong> once Civic Drive is underway.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Since all of humanity participates, it\u2019s only natural that society\u2019s technological level would advance rapidly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
resulting in a structure that is far more advantageous for human survival and daily life<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In nationalism-based societies, future collapse through war is often baked into social planning.
But in a Civic Drive world, such systems that promote and accelerate destruction will no longer exist<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
would shift instead toward developing technologies that protect life<\/strong>\u2014like enhancing the human body to withstand nuclear weapons.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
Even for the wealthy, there are benefits:
If everyone is rich, there\u2019s no longer any need to protect one\u2019s wealth, and people can live as friends.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
And the wealthy\u2014recognizing this as the greatest achievement in human history\u2014will likely be the first to donate,
seeking honor, recognition, and a legacy that endures through the ages.<\/p>\n\n\n\nGVS Is Fun! A Miraculous Tool That Lets You Change Society Just by Playing a Game!<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Why? Because current systems\u2014such as elections, parliamentary debates, and social media\u2014which are supposedly used to gather public opinion, cannot actually aggregate opinions<\/strong> or generate the kind of unified movement needed to bring about real social change.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Because it can drive true social transformation<\/strong>, the wealthy are motivated to donate to these activities.
And as they do, citizens’ incomes steadily increase<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
So next, let\u2019s break down the actual tasks involved in GVS<\/strong>\u2014and explore whether it can truly spark a Civic Drive and bring about meaningful societal change.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
Discuss and Elect a Representative<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
However, what sets it apart from ordinary discussions or voting is that it follows a deliberate progression:
discussion \u2192 agreement \u2192 consent \u2192 vote<\/strong>\u2014a structured process that builds commitment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Because the goal isn\u2019t to end with just a discussion\u2014it\u2019s to actually spark a real movement in society<\/strong>.
In that sense, GVS can be described as a miracle-making tool for societal transformation<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
and then turn that conclusion into collective action<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\nChat in Groups of 3 to 5 People<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
For example, you might join a room titled \u201cLet\u2019s Choose Politicians Who Support Tax Cuts.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
They begin their discussion and, at the end, select one representative.
Those representatives are then grouped again into new teams of 3 to 5, repeat the discussion, and select another representative.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Of course, if no real outcomes result\u2014if taxes don\u2019t actually get reduced\u2014then GVS becomes meaningless<\/strong>,
the Civic Drive doesn\u2019t happen<\/strong>, and we citizens receive no reward<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
but here we\u2019ll offer a simple overview of the system<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\nWhy Do GVS Decisions Have Such Strong Cohesive Power?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Take an influencer who\u2019s popular and supported by the public:
If they claim they\u2019re working toward tax cuts, many people may cheer them on\u2014but isn\u2019t there a sense of detachment<\/strong>?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
As long as we rely on this kind of structure, citizens will never truly unite and take action together<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But while demonstrations or riots may appear to be \u201ccitizen-led movements\u201d (Civic Drives), they\u2019re actually something else<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
one that actively works in favor of human survival and well-being.<\/p>\n\n\n\nIsn\u2019t the Voting System Supposed to Unite Public Opinion?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
You might think they\u2019re meant to unite public opinion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Why? Because voters never actually talk to each other directly<\/strong>, so there’s no sense of shared responsibility<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Such opinions lack true agency and fluctuate depending on mood or emotion<\/strong>.
And when opinions change so easily, a meaningful movement cannot take shape<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\nIn GVS, No One Is a Bystander\u2014Everyone Stays Actively Engaged<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Because the groups are small, unlike large-scale discussions, no one ends up as a passive observer<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Chat logs can be viewed in real time, making the process transparent and helping to prevent manipulation or unfairness<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This means that a contract and a vote are formed through group consensus<\/strong>, creating a sense of responsibility.
Participants feel, \u201cI helped make this decision.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
they recognize that behavior as stemming from the same discussion and topic\u2014creating a sense of solidarity<\/strong>,
and from that, a real movement begins<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cWe are all allies, and I have the right and the ability to influence society.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
especially the concept of the Adlerian triangle<\/strong>, which helped shape the design of GVS.<\/p>\n\n\n\nWon\u2019t Arguments Break Out During Discussions?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
For example, if someone tries to say something like this:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
“My boss is seriously the worst. He doesn\u2019t treat his subordinates like human beings and gives nothing but harassing instructions.
I\u2019m working overtime every day until 10 p.m. I have no idea why a guy like that gets to act so superior.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n
“In my workplace, I often feel disrespected as a human being due to one-sided instructions and a lack of understanding from my boss.
Right now, I\u2019m thinking about how we can build a relationship where open dialogue is possible,
and whether it\u2019s feasible to create a system that fosters mutual understanding throughout the workplace.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This is just one example\u2014the system is designed to convert any kind of language<\/strong> to avoid conflict.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
can join with peace of mind<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
but the system successfully prevents fights<\/strong>.
For generating ideas and proposals, AI uses tools like critical thinking<\/strong> to assist the participant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
If you’re interested in a deeper explanation, that article would be a good reference.<\/p>\n\n\n\nWhat\u2019s the Reason AI Conversion Prevents Arguments?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
But when the focus shifts to \u201cWhat should we do moving forward?\u201d<\/em>, it naturally brings participants together<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It\u2019s not the communication style of a cooperative society.
That said, in GVS, AI automatically converts language to fit a cooperative style<\/strong>,
so participants don\u2019t need to worry about this consciously\u2014they can just join in.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
we\u2019ll be able to communicate our needs peacefully with others and improve our lives and society<\/strong> together.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This will gradually lead to a society where everyone feels they have allies, and that they are capable and empowered<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\nIf Messages Are Automatically Rewritten, Won\u2019t That Distort My Intentions?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
However, it does allow you to clearly express your dissatisfaction, complaints, or requests<\/strong> to others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
what they actually mean is:
\u201cI have a need or demand\u2014something I want you to do, or stop doing.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
so our way of speaking has become aligned with that mentality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
While negotiations between nations often assume conflict or war, negotiation within a single society is based on cooperation<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Using warlike speech domestically\u2014between fellow citizens\u2014may simulate international warfare,
but even in today\u2019s world, it\u2019s not encouraged, nor is it meaningful<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Humans created societies to survive.
If we end up killing each other, it defeats the very purpose of building a society<\/strong> in the first place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
expressing hostility is not only unnecessary, but counterproductive to the discussion itself<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\nWon\u2019t There Be Differences Based on Age, Gender, or Nationality?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
We\u2019re naturally inclined to cooperate with those we consider friends\u2014and not with those we don\u2019t.
This is a normal psychological tendency among humans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Furthermore, the system automatically alters language<\/strong> so that you cannot identify someone\u2019s age, gender, or nationality<\/strong> from how they speak.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Conversely, if a renowned scholar expresses something, and a 5-year-old is reading it, the language will be converted into child-friendly phrasing<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But that\u2019s not the case.
Complicated language is often used more for social signaling<\/strong> than for actual comprehension\u2014and the core message can still be fully understood<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Even if comprehension is sometimes an illusion, you don\u2019t need to worry about that level of detail.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Don\u2019t fall into the trap of thinking, \u201cThis person is just a child, so they\u2019re not part of my group,\u201d<\/em>
or \u201cThis person is too elite or educated to be one of us.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
and the movement dies<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
If male, then all speech may appear in masculine language<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
in which case, even if a man is writing, it might be displayed to you in feminine phrasing<\/strong>, or vice versa.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
age, gender, nationality, and other identifiers remain invisible<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
So Japanese users will see everything in Japanese<\/strong>, and American users will see everything in